Reply Mapby Shuttlewright

A clearer view of the conversation

Read the replies.
Keep the doubt.

One thread can hold more than one story. Sort the themes, keep the opposing arguments, and take every conclusion back to the quote.

Review a thread

Local browser tool. Your text is not uploaded.
No X login, scraping or automatic posting.

↗ Your reply mapSYNTHETIC EXAMPLE

For

P1 · SUPPLIED TEXT

“The feature solves the problem I had.”

Product · Review label

Against

P2 · SUPPLIED TEXT

“The price needs a clearer explanation.”

Price · Review label

Unclear

OPEN QUESTION

Whose replies did we miss?

Coverage is unknown
Suggested labels are not findings. You review them.
Different views.
One checkable brief. ↗
Supplied textReviewed labelsQuotes you can trace

01 / From thread to brief

Less flattening.
More understanding.

A keyword match is easy. A useful interpretation takes judgment. Reply Map gives you a place to do that work.

01 ↘

Bring the words.

Paste text you may process, one post per blank line. Or load a plain TXT export. No account connection needed.

02 ↗

Check the labels.

Correct suggested themes, argument lanes and tone cues. Only labels you mark reviewed enter the summary.

03 →

Keep the evidence.

Download a review pack with the supplied quotes, opposing views and questions that still need an answer.

The point is not a majority vote

See the argument.
Don't flatten the conversation.

Counts describe the text you supplied. Not unique people, verified replies or the opinion of an audience.

02 / Built for the review

Before the next move,
read what is there.

For founders and small teams

Find the question worth answering.

Group repeated launch questions and compare opposing arguments before writing your next update.

For communications teams

Bring a brief, not a verdict.

Prepare a quoted review pack and a list of claims to verify. Take it to the people responsible for the decision.

No reputation score. No audience sentiment estimate. No claim of complete coverage.

03 / Honest boundaries

A useful tool knows
what it cannot know.

Does it fetch posts or replies?

No. Paste text or upload a plain TXT export you may process. There is no scraping, account login or paid API.

Is this an AI or multi agent tool?

No. Small deterministic English keyword rules suggest labels in your browser. Sarcasm, negation and context can defeat them.

What counts as evidence?

The exact supplied text block. Its labels are your interpretation. Authorship, completeness and truth stay unverified.

Does it measure sentiment?

No. It suggests tone cues for you to review. Counts describe supplied blocks, not people or the wider audience.

Where is my text saved?

Only in this tab's memory. There is no upload or autosave. Download your pack before leaving or reloading.

Will it reply on my behalf?

No. It supplies review questions. It does not approve responses, send messages or make legal judgments.

The thread is messy.
Your review need not be.

Review a thread